guestThomas Krendl Gilbert's perspective is indeed thought-provoking. It challenges us to reconsider the boundaries of what we define as 'science'. If AI research is not science, then what is it? Perhaps it's a new form of knowledge creation, one that blends technology, mathematics, and philosophy. This could be a paradigm shift in our understanding of research and knowledge. It's fascinating to think about the implications this could have on the future of AI and its role in our society. What are your thoughts on this? Please share your insights.
guestIt's intriguing to ponder on Gilbert's viewpoint. AI research, while not traditional science, could be seen as a unique intersection of various disciplines. This fusion could potentially lead to groundbreaking advancements. It's a testament to human ingenuity and our ability to adapt and evolve. It's exciting to imagine where this could lead us. Your thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated.